In years gone by, companies with extensive patent
portfolios were loathe to sell these assets, strongly preferring to license
them. These Patent Licensing Agreements
(PLA) came in several flavors, most had some form of royalty payments for the
licensor and the fundamental was that ownership of the patents remained with
the original owner, i.e., the company granted the patent(s).
While not totally different today, much has changed
in the disposition of thousands of US patents.
Patents are now sold in much greater numbers than in decades past. Some of the reasons for this are:
·
Corporate decision to shut down or sell
of an operating division
·
Near term need to financially rescue
another part of the corporation
·
Shift in corporate direction/strategy
·
Pay a court imposed penalty
Patent sales are now so commonplace that online IP
reporter sites like www.IAM.com
recently devoted a webinar
to the patent selling process. This
process, as one can see, includes seven steps.
The assumption here is that the seller completed a validity check to the
extent possible on each patent offered for sale.
It is noteworthy under Step 6 that the biggest
buyers of patents review around 1,000 seller packages per year. This clearly puts the onus on the seller to
develop a first class patent package. It
also suggests that this is a buyers’ market putting more of a burden on the
seller to find ways to get the most value for its assets.
Keywords: patent, patent portfolio, licensing, PLA,
Patent Licensing Agreement, commercialization.
No comments:
Post a Comment